It would be same as saying if a US President opposed radical action on Global Warming saying "300,000,000 American opposed to action on Global Warming" because the leader says so. Hardern 17:23, 4 December 2006 (UTC) The headlines for Global Warming hysteria articles are often like that. Hardern 17:30, 1 December 2006 (UTC) What about the headline? Narssarssuaq 17:52, 1 December 2006 (UTC) Yeah, you're right about that. I can't find a misleading statement in there which would differ from your explanation. The is letter (sic!) signed by presidents of 22 locals of five unions". Environmental Protection Agency scientists are calling on Congress to take immediate action against global warming. Entry 306(b)(i) in my Guidebook to the Real World is "Never trust a press release." Raymond Arritt 04:09, 1 December 2006 (UTC) The press release reads as follows : "In an unprecedented action, representatives for more than 10,000 U.S. The so-called "petition" makes no actual mention of a petition anywhere. The actual document is a letter from 22 union bosses representing a union with over 10,000 scientists and support staff. More Than 10,000 EPA Scientists File Mass Petition for Action on Global Warming, NovemSimesa 01:59, 1 December 2006 (UTC) And a pretty inaccurate one. It's a press release, but a pretty shocking one: 43 Why is there no POV tag on this article?.42 Please exclude the word "concensus" from various sections, and revise.38 Need for long-term geological perspective.36 Effect of incident angle of light on reflectivity.23 The numbers: metric units and probability intervals.15 Do you think it would be appropriate =.14 This article has problems (RFC responses).10 We need to remember - this is just a THEORY.7 Anthropogenic Global Warming is the same thing as Anthropogenic Global Cooling, just with different words.
0 kommentar(er)
